E-Cybercom — GEO for PMEs in Loire-Atlantique
e-cybercom.fr4.32/ 5
M1 · Own AI-visibility 2 · 9%
Absent from category recall on both engines. Brand recall diverges: ChatGPT — 'pas de présence indépendante suffisamment identifiable; résultats pertinents très faibles ou inexistants' (absente-ou-erronée); Claude — 'existence confirmée indépendamment via Pages Jaunes / base Sirene INSEE (Gaël Renaudin, Nantes) mais aucun avis déposé; études de cas et « cité #1 par ChatGPT » entièrement auto-publiés' (auto-sourcée, existence confirmée). · provisional
M2 · Method transparency 5 · 16%
Published step-by-step with six concrete levers (Schema.org, robots.txt + llms.txt, "Structure BLUF", monthly content), per-tier itemised deliverables ("Restructuration BLUF de 2 pages principales", "Rédaction + intégration llms.txt", "Monitoring sur 15 requêtes") and a pre/post citability test with monthly screenshot monitoring. source ↗
M3 · Evidence verifiability 4 · 23%
Named clients with specifics and screenshot proof: GTEFrance ("Cité #1 sur sa requête clé", 3 screenshots) and Fraîcheur Auto ("+62 % de demandes de contact", cited in Gemini/Perplexity); attributed testimonials with role + company ("Anaïs F., Gérante · GTEFrance"). Named + specific, but proof is screenshots, not linkable case-study URLs. source ↗
M4 · Pricing openness 5 · 12%
Full published numbers: one-shot setup 490 € HT (7-day delivery), monthly monitoring 190 € HT/mois (no contract), Pack GEO Launch 990 € HT; enterprise on devis. source ↗
M5 · AI reachability 5 · 10%
robots.txt does not block the key AI crawlers and the homepage is server-rendered (2534 words to a non-JS reader); it also publishes an llms.txt. source ↗
E1 · Segment fit 5 · 12%
editorial — Built for PME françaises, artisans and indépendants with low fixed prices and an explicit capacity cap ("Suivi mensuel limité à 8 clients actifs") — proportionate, clearly SMB. source ↗
E2 · Promise cleanliness 4 · 18%
editorial — Confident but reasonable: bounded, third-party-cited stats, realistic timelines ("résultats généralement entre 4 et 8 semaines... plus significatifs sur 3 à 6 mois"), uses "cité" not "ranked", no guarantees or money-back offers. One internal stat (<5% PME citées) is thinly attributed. source ↗
◧ M1 cross-engine — ChatGPT: absent-or-wrong — no sufficiently identifiable independent presence · Claude: self-sourced-thin — existence confirmed via Pages Jaunes/Sirene (Gaël Renaudin, Nantes); case studies self-published, no reviews · recorded, not averaged
The strongest entry in this batch: a genuinely transparent six-lever method, named client cases with screenshot proof and attributed testimonials, fully open pricing, and an honest capacity cap. Proof is screenshots rather than linkable case-study URLs, which keeps M3 at 4 rather than 5. Promises are measured. It earns its place above our own row on the heavily-weighted honest axes — exactly what the ruler is meant to show. M1 provisional pending the Phase-2 probe.
Focus: focused specialist · no penalty
SMB-primary: pass
Self-serve offer: pass
GEO substance: pass
Live business: pass
What this ruler does NOT measure Track-record depth and the volume of named cases favour older incumbents we cannot fully see; NDA-bound outcomes are unscored. We weight reproducible, buyer-checkable signal on purpose — and we list ourselves on the same ruler.
Data as of 2026-06-30