PGAS — AI-visibility agency
pgas.online3.23/ 5
M1 · Own AI-visibility 1 · 9%
Absent from category recall on both engines. Brand recall empty on BOTH: ChatGPT — 'la búsqueda está muy contaminada por el ticker bursátil PGAS y otras organizaciones; no encontré evidencia independiente clara de una agencia de marketing/SEO en pgas.online' (ausente); Claude — 'no encuentro ninguna agencia GEO/marketing en pgas.online; el acrónimo colisiona con entidades sin relación (telco PGAS, PGA de golf...); ni siquiera tiene entidad propia diferenciada' (ausente-o-incorrecta). Invisible — consistent with a just-opened shop that openly has no documented cases yet.
M2 · Method transparency 4 · 16%
Clear process and deliverables — "Compras el diagnóstico → Confirmas pago y datos → Recibes Loom + PDF en 48 horas → Revisamos juntos en una llamada"; a 15–20 min Loom, a 5–8 page prioritised PDF, an action plan, a 30-min call, plus "Auditoría rápida en Google" and "Análisis de menciones en ChatGPT y Perplexity". It even names the tools used ("Lighthouse, Schema Validator, búsquedas en Google"). source ↗
M3 · Evidence verifiability 2 · 23%
No client evidence — and openly so: "PGAS es una consultoría recién abriendo. Preferimos no mostrar testimonios genéricos ni casos inventados. Los primeros casos documentados se publicarán en los próximos meses." Honest, but checkable proof is genuinely absent today. source ↗
M4 · Pricing openness 5 · 12%
Single fully published price — "$79.000 pago único · CLP", "Descontable 100% si contratas implementación"; payment coordinated by email (transfer or WebPay). source ↗
M5 · AI reachability 5 · 10%
robots.txt does not block the key AI crawlers and the homepage is server-rendered (2833 words to a non-JS reader); it also publishes an llms.txt. source ↗
E1 · Segment fit 5 · 12%
editorial — Squarely SMB — "Pymes B2B, consultoras, SaaS pequeños, e-commerce y profesionales independientes con sitio propio", explicitly excluding "retail puro de marca conocida". A small fixed-price product, no enterprise minimum. source ↗
E2 · Promise cleanliness 3 · 18%
editorial — Carries a satisfaction money-back — "Si el diagnóstico no te sirve… te devuelvo el 100% del dinero" — and no ranking guarantee or manipulation language. JUDGMENT CALL: per CitationRegister calibration a refundable/money-back guarantee lowers E2 and does NOT trip the red-flag cap; but this is satisfaction-with-the-deliverable, not a performance/ranking guarantee, and it sits beside an explicit refusal to fabricate cases — so scored at 3 (cleaner than a work-free results guarantee), flagged for human confirmation. source ↗
◧ M1 cross-engine — ChatGPT: absent-or-wrong — search swamped by the PGAS stock ticker; no clear independent evidence of an SEO agency · Claude: absent-or-wrong — no GEO/marketing agency found; name collides with unrelated entities (telco, golf PGA) · recorded, not averaged
A brand-new Chilean consultancy with an unusually transparent, tool-named 48-hour diagnosis and refreshing candour — it refuses to show invented cases and offers a satisfaction refund. That candour is also its ceiling on the evidence axis: with no documented cases yet, M3 is genuinely low today (number + hypothesis: young shop, proof pending). The money-back keeps E2 mid-range under calibration, though it is a deliverable-satisfaction refund rather than a results guarantee. Own-visibility (M1) is provisional.
Focus: SEO-led hybrid · -0.20 applied to composite
SMB-primary: pass
Self-serve offer: pass
GEO substance: pass
Live business: pass
What this ruler does NOT measure Track-record depth and the volume of named cases favour older incumbents we cannot fully see; NDA-bound outcomes are unscored. We weight reproducible, buyer-checkable signal on purpose — and we list ourselves on the same ruler.
Data as of 2026-06-30