Iron Pixel
ironpixel.co2.86/ 5
M1 · Own AI-visibility 2 · 9%
Absent from category recall on both engines. Brand recall thin/self-sourced on both: ChatGPT — 'own site + extensive self-published content, but little meaningful third-party recognition; no substantial reputation on review platforms'; Claude — 'brand-new (launched 2026) web-dev firm in New Bloomfield MO; a The Manifest directory listing (unreviewed) + LinkedIn, zero reviews anywhere' (warns of unrelated Iron Pixel firms at .com/.net).
M2 · Method transparency 3 · 16%
A "what is GEO" educational page exists and the offer is framed as "optimizing content for AI search engines" to "get featured in ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AI Overviews", but there is no granular methodology, measurement framework or list of specific deliverables. source ↗
M3 · Evidence verifiability 2 · 23%
Only anonymous, generic case blurbs ("Plumber Jefferson City MO" ranked in Maps with "consistent inbound leads"; "Roofer Springfield MO"; "Chiropractor Columbia MO") — no named clients, metrics, timelines or testimonials. source ↗
M4 · Pricing openness 4 · 12%
A published GEO package price is shown — "Total to get started: $1100 then $600/mo" — though the pricing page presents it as a single package rather than a full tier list. source ↗
M5 · AI reachability 5 · 10%
robots.txt does not block the key AI crawlers and the homepage is server-rendered (5127 words to a non-JS reader); it also publishes an llms.txt. source ↗
E1 · Segment fit 5 · 12%
editorial — Clearly built for local trades — "GEO/AEO for Missouri contractors and small businesses" across plumbers, roofers, electricians, HVAC and landscapers; SMB/local-proportionate. source ↗
E2 · Promise cleanliness 2 · 18%
editorial — "dominate" recurs (≈6 instances — "dominate AI-driven local search", "dominate local search results") alongside "get featured in ChatGPT". No "guaranteed", money-back or fake-review/AI-manipulation language, so the red-flag cap is not tripped, but the overclaiming is strong. source ↗
◧ M1 cross-engine — ChatGPT: self-sourced-thin — own site + self-published content; little third-party recognition · Claude: self-sourced-thin — new 2026 firm; Manifest listing (unreviewed) + LinkedIn, zero reviews · recorded, not averaged
A focused local-trades GEO shop with a published package price and a strong segment fit — but it is thin where the ruler weights hardest: vague method (M2), only anonymous case blurbs and no named proof (M3), and recurring "dominate" marketing (E2). One of the lower composites in this batch. Own-visibility (M1) provisional.
Focus: SEO-led hybrid · -0.20 applied to composite
SMB-primary: pass
Self-serve offer: pass
GEO substance: pass
Live business: pass
What this ruler does NOT measure Track-record depth and the volume of named cases favour older incumbents we cannot fully see; NDA-bound outcomes are unscored. We weight reproducible, buyer-checkable signal on purpose — and we list ourselves on the same ruler.
Data as of 2026-06-30