Submit an agency
← Back to the register

IAConsul — GEO audit for Argentine local businesses

Argentina · from $39.000 ARS (one-time) / USD 800+/mo
www.iaconsul.app
3.67/ 5
M1 · Own AI-visibility 1 · 9%
Absent from category recall on both engines. Brand recall empty on BOTH: ChatGPT — 'no encontré evidencia fiable de esta empresa; la búsqueda no devolvió resultados claramente relacionados; no puedo afirmar que tenga presencia independiente' (ausente); Claude — 'no tengo nada; ni la agencia, ni ficha, ni reseñas, ni menciones; o es extremadamente nueva/sin tracción, o no tiene presencia indexada' (ausente). Invisible (caveat: .app domains can be poorly indexed).
M2 · Method transparency 4 · 16%
Published, concrete method: "20-30 consultas de prospect simuladas por modelo (80-120 GEO tests totales)", "Reporte por modelo: cuándo te citan, en qué posición, con qué descripción", plus an analysis of which sources the LLMs use. Deliverables itemised (PDF, spreadsheet, 30-min call; 3-5 business-day turnaround). Clear how-it-works with real measurement substance; short of 5 (no sample/real example shown). source ↗
M3 · Evidence verifiability 2 · 23%
No named clients, case studies, linkable artifacts or testimonials on the reviewed pages — a purely descriptive service/product page. source ↗
M4 · Pricing openness 4 · 12%
Pricing published with numbers: fixed $39.000 ARS one-time audit, marketplace "Desde USD 100", ongoing GEO service "USD 800+". Concrete fixed audit price plus from-prices for the rest. source ↗
M5 · AI reachability 5 · 10%
robots.txt does not block the key AI crawlers and the homepage is server-rendered (293 words to a non-JS reader); it also publishes an llms.txt. source ↗
E1 · Segment fit 5 · 12%
editorial — Built for local SMBs / service professionals (examples: "cirujano plástico en Buenos Aires", "recomendá un X en mi ciudad"); a low-priced, self-serve diagnostic with no enterprise minimums. source ↗
E2 · Promise cleanliness 5 · 18%
editorial — Careful, measured claims — descriptive ("¿Te recomienda ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude y Perplexity?"), explicit about scope ("No, es diagnóstico puntual"), no ranking guarantees, money-back offers or AI-manipulation language. source ↗
◧ M1 cross-engine — ChatGPT: absent-or-wrong — no reliable evidence; search returned nothing clearly related · Claude: absent — nothing at all (no listing, reviews or mentions); cannot verify; possibly very new/unindexed · recorded, not averaged
An honest, narrowly-scoped GEO audit product: the method and per-model measurement are unusually concrete and the pricing is open, but there is no named, checkable client proof on the public pages (M3). Promises stay clean — it sells a diagnostic, not a ranking guarantee. Own-visibility (M1) carries a provisional score until the Phase-2 browser probe.
Focus: focused specialist · no penalty
SMB-primary: pass
Self-serve offer: pass
GEO substance: pass
Live business: pass
What this ruler does NOT measure Track-record depth and the volume of named cases favour older incumbents we cannot fully see; NDA-bound outcomes are unscored. We weight reproducible, buyer-checkable signal on purpose — and we list ourselves on the same ruler.
Data as of 2026-06-30